Unit 9 Coordination Compounds (Intext Questions-3)

Intext Questions

9.5 Explain on the basis of valence bond theory that $\left[\mathrm{Ni}(\mathrm{CN})_4\right]^{2-}$ ion with square planar structure is diamagnetic and the $\left[\mathrm{NiCl_4}\right]^{2-}$ ion with tetrahedral geometry is paramagnetic.

Show Answer

Answer

$\mathrm{Ni}$ is in the +2 oxidation state i.e., in $\mathrm{d}^{8}$ configuration.

There are $4 \mathrm{CN}^{-}$ ions. Thus, it can either have a tetrahedral geometry or square planar geometry. Since $\mathrm{CN}^{-}$ ion is a strong field ligand, it causes the pairing of unpaired $3 d$ electrons.

It now undergoes $\mathrm{dsp}^{2}$ hybridization. Since all electrons are paired, it is diamagnetic.

In case of $\left[\mathrm{NiCl_4}\right]^{2-}, $ chloride ion is a weak field ligand. Therefore, it does not lead to the pairing of unpaired $3 d$ electrons. Therefore, it undergoes $s p^{3}$ hybridization.

Since there are 2 unpaired electrons in this case, it is paramagnetic in nature.

9.6 $\left[\mathrm{NiCl_4}\right]^{2-}$ is paramagnetic while $\left[\mathrm{Ni}(\mathrm{CO})_4\right]$ is diamagnetic though both are tetrahedral. Why?

Show Answer

Answer

Though both $\left[\mathrm{NiCl_4}\right]^{2-}$ and $\left[\mathrm{Ni}(\mathrm{CO})_{4}\right]$ are tetrahedral, their magnetic characters are different. This is due to a difference in the nature of ligands. $\mathrm{Cl}^{-}$ is a weak field ligand and it does not cause the pairing of unpaired $3 d$ electrons. Hence, $\left[\mathrm{NiCl_4}\right]^{2-}$ is paramagnetic.

In $\mathrm{Ni}(\mathrm{CO})_{4}, \mathrm{Ni}$ is in the zero oxidation state i.e., it has a configuration of $3 d^{8} 4 s^{2}$

But $\mathrm{CO}$ is a strong field ligand. Therefore, it causes the pairing of unpaired $3 d$ electrons. Also, it causes the $4 \mathrm{~s}$ electrons to shift to the $3 d$ orbital, thereby giving rise to $s p^{3}$ hybridization. Since no unpaired electrons are present in this case, $\left[\mathrm{Ni}(\mathrm{CO})_{4}\right]$ is diamagnetic.

9.7 $\left[\mathrm{Fe}\left(\mathrm{H_2} \mathrm{O}\right)_6\right]^{3+}$ is strongly paramagnetic whereas $\left[\mathrm{Fe}(\mathrm{CN})_6\right]^{3-}$ is weakly paramagnetic. Explain.

Show Answer

Answer

In both $[\mathrm{Fe(H_2O)_6}]^{3+}$ and $[\mathrm{Fe}\mathrm{(CN)_6}]^{3-}$, Fe exists in the +3 oxidation state i.e., in $d^{5}$ configuration.

Since $\mathrm{CN}^-$ is a strong field ligand, it causes the pairing of unpaired electrons. Therefore, there is only one unpaired electron left in the $d$-orbital.

Therefore,

$ \begin{aligned} \mu & =\sqrt{n(n+2)} \\ & =\sqrt{1(1+2)} \\ & =\sqrt{3} \\ & =1.732\ \mathrm{BM} \end{aligned} $

On the other hand, $\mathrm{H_2} \mathrm{O}$ is a weak field ligand. Therefore, it cannot cause the pairing of electrons. This means that the number of unpaired electrons is 5 .

Therefore,

$ \begin{aligned} \mu & =\sqrt{n(n+2)} \\ & =\sqrt{5(5+2)} \\ & =\sqrt{35} \\ & 3.873\ \mathrm{BM} \end{aligned} $

Thus, it is evident that $[\mathrm{Fe(H_2 O)_6}]^{3+}$ is strongly paramagnetic, while $[\mathrm{Fe(CN)_6}]^{3-}$ is weakly paramagnetic.

9.8 Explain $\left[\mathrm{Co}\left(\mathrm{NH_3}\right)_6\right]^{3+}$ is an inner orbital complex whereas $\left[\mathrm{Ni}\left(\mathrm{NH_3}\right)_6\right]^{2+}$ is an outer orbital complex.

Show Answer

Answer

$\left[\mathrm{Co}\left(\mathrm{NH}_3\right)_6\right]^{3+}$ $\left[\mathrm{Ni}\left(\mathrm{NH}_3\right)_6\right]^{2+}$
Oxidation state of cobalt $=+3$ Oxidation state of $\mathrm{Ni}=+2$
Electronic configuration of cobalt $=d^6$ Electronic configuration of nickel $=d^8$
$\mathrm{NH}_3$ being a strong field ligand for $CO^{3+}$ causes the pairing. Therefore, Cobalt can undergo $d^2 s p^3$ hybridization.
If $\mathrm{NH}_3$ causes the pairing, then only one $3 d$ orbital is empty. Thus, it cannot undergo $d^s s p^3$ hybridization. Therefore, it undergoes $s p^3 d^2$ hybridization.
Hence, it is an inner orbital complex. Hence, it forms an outer orbital complex.

9.9 Predict the number of unpaired electrons in the square planar $\left[\mathrm{Pt}(\mathrm{CN})_{4}\right]^{2-}$ ion.

Show Answer

Answer

$\left[\mathrm{Pt}(\mathrm{CN})_{4}\right]^{2-}$

In this complex, $\mathrm{Pt}$ is in the +2 state. It forms a square planar structure. This means that it undergoes $d p^{2}$ hybridization. Now, the electronic configuration of $\mathrm{Pd}(+2)$ is $5 d^{8}$.

$\mathrm{CN}^{-}$ being a strong field ligand causes the pairing of unpaired electrons. Hence, there are no unpaired electrons in $\left[\operatorname{Pt}(\mathrm{CN})_{4}\right]^{2-}$.

9.10 The hexaquo manganese(II) ion contains five unpaired electrons, while the hexacyanoion contains only one unpaired electron. Explain using Crystal Field Theory.

Show Answer

Answer

$\left[\mathrm{Mn}\left(\mathrm{H_2} \mathrm{O}\right)_{6}\right]^{2+}$ $\left[\mathrm{Mn}(\mathrm{CN})_{6}\right]^{4-}$
$\mathrm{Mn}$ is in the +2 oxidation state. $\mathrm{Mn}$ is in the +2 oxidation state.
The electronic configuration is $\mathrm{d}^{5}$ The electronic configuration is $\mathrm{d}^{5}$
The crystal field is octahedral. Water is a weak field ligand. Therefore, the arrangement of the electrons in $\left[\mathrm{Mn}\left(\mathrm{H_2} \mathrm{O}\right){6}\right]^{2+}$ is $t{2g}^3e_g^2$. The crystal field is octahedral. Cyanide is a strong field ligand. Therefore, the arrangement of the electrons in $\left[\mathrm{Mn}(\mathrm{CN}){6}\right]^{4-}$ is $t^{5}{2g}e^{0}_{g}$.

Hence, hexaaquo manganese (II) ion has five unpaired electrons, while hexacyano ion has only one unpaired electron.



sathee Ask SATHEE

Welcome to SATHEE !
Select from 'Menu' to explore our services, or ask SATHEE to get started. Let's embark on this journey of growth together! 🌐📚🚀🎓

I'm relatively new and can sometimes make mistakes.
If you notice any error, such as an incorrect solution, please use the thumbs down icon to aid my learning.
To begin your journey now, click on

Please select your preferred language
कृपया अपनी पसंदीदा भाषा चुनें